Search
tip
To search for a particular word
- press Ctrl and F keys together on your keyboard.
Then enter the word - you will
be taken to every instance of that word on this page

What is Professional Indemnity Insurance?
In terms of the cover we offer Professional Indemnity, is only a
part. The other major form of cover we include is Public Liability.
There are still more important elements of a policy - but these
two are the principle elements.
Professional Indemnity is sometimes known
as “Malpractice”. What it covers is a claim made against
you in consequence of something that transpired as a direct result
of you practicing your professional following.
Example:
A doctor wrongly prescribes a medicine – you are ill as a
result
Public Liability is quite different and covers an event
that has nothing to do with you practicing your following –
rather an event that occurred because you were, or whilst you were,
following your practice.
Example: A client (patient) trips up and breaks a leg while
walking on your carpet in your surgery.
What is Public Liability
insurance and is it included?
Let us deal with the second part of the question first. Our policy
includes Public Liability.
Now to deal with what it is.
Public liability covers a claim made against you by a member of
the public, and that means it isn't necessarily a client. On the
other hand a person making a claim for professional negligence,
of necessity, has to be a client.
For public liability, it could be a client - or it need not be.
A claim could be brought against you because, it is claimed, they
were scalded by a (too) hot cup of tea, fell over a broke a bone
or did anything that gives rise to a claim - where the claimant
says it was your fault.
A claim could be for almost anything where there is the opportunity
to point the finger at you - but most likely not to do with your
professional practice, but as a result of you being where you were,
what you did, the premises you occupy while you were about you were
on your "business".
Therefore you could even be exhibiting at a show - and your public
liability section of the policy protects you there.
Why is it important?
Because none of us know what’s around the corner. A description
of insurance made hundreds of years ago – still hold good
today – “A way in which the plight of the few falls
upon the many”.
Insurance is important because - if a claim were made against you
the financial consequences could be ruinous. The premium isn't but
the cost of a claim could be.

What are the key dates?
There are five key dates within a Professional Indemnity policy.
Policy start date & Policy end date
The date you first know of a claim & The date on which the incident
that gives rise to the claim occurred
The retroactive date
Policy start date & Policy end date
This is the policy term. Usually these dates are 1 year apart, and
unless otherwise specified would assume midnight to midnight. You
are covered for claims that arise during the policy term.
The date you first know of a claim & The date on which the incident
that gives rise to the claim occurred
This pair are again self explanatory.
The retroactive date
Our Professional Indemnity policy is what is termed "Claims made".
That means the insurers will consider a claim that they are advised
of (and you must tell them at once!) during the policy year. The
incident that caused the claim will have occurred in the past. Cover
is provided for an incident that occurred AFTER the retroactive
date. Our policy has no retroactive date and therefore our policy
covers you during the policy terms for an incident that could have
occurred at any time in the past.
So, by way of example, if your policy year was 1st January - 31st
December 2006 - then if between 1st January 2006 and 31st December
2006 you first became aware of a claim (and it related to an incident
say 3 years ago) and advised the insurer then the insurer will deal
with that claim, even though the incident that caused the claim
happened years ago.
You might also like to see:
What is the difference between a "Claims made" and
a "Claims arising" policy?
Or:
The retroactive date

How much does it cost?
The premium is available on the site – tailored to your circumstances.

What should I ask an insurer
when purchasing professional indemnity insurance for the first time?
What is not covered.
What type of policy is it - Claims made or Claims arising?
First we need to get to grips with very slightly different
words that can mean very different things, and only apply to Professional
Indemnity policies.
Claim made: When a claim is made
Claim arising: Not when the claim is made,
but when the incident that caused the claim occurred - it could
be years ago!
Claims made Policy means the insurer will
consider a claim that is made during the year of insurance. If you
always had claims made policies then the insurer in whose year the
claim is made - is duty bound to deal with it.
Claims arising Policy means the insurer in whose policy
year the claim actually arose - it could have been years ago - deals
with the claim.
What is the retroactive date position?
The retroactive date means the date from which claim will be entertained.
Therefore it tends to apply to Claims Made policies. Some, like
ours, have no actual date and cover claims arising from any time
in the past. Others will specify a date.
The real difference between the two to you:
1 A claims made policy with no retroactive
date - or one that is that start date of your business - can be
renewed annually and all the time you are covered - then any claim
that arises will be dealt with by the current insurer. When you
stop work you then need to have "run-off" cover which
continues to provide you with cover against a claim that can be
made in the future. Clearly "run-off" cover is not required
for a claims arising policy.
2 You do not want to be switching between the two
without being fully aware of the consequences. If you move to a
Claims arising policy from Claims made you could
almost wind up with the worst of all possible worlds!
3 Most policies are claims made. Ours is!

How much professional
indemnity insurance should I have?
We offer £1,000,000 or £2,000,000 cover per claim.
Some of our clients have £2,000,000 of cover because their
clients insist upon it. Many of our clients believe £1,000,000
per claim is perfectly adequate. Unfortunately there is no correct
answer to this question.

Does my professional indemnity
insurance automatically cover me when I work internationally?
Depends on the policy. With us, the answer is YES if it’s
not USA or Canada and the total overseas work (as measured by income
generated) does not exceed 20% of total practice income.

If not, how do I get professional
indemnity insurance for different regions?
Well, let’s start by ensuring that we understand what overseas
income really is. If you are actually in another country and providing
services in another countries, then clearly you are providing a
service in that country and will be covered by the laws of that
country. If you provide a service from the UK – perhaps by
telephone – then that is probably NOT overseas income as the
service you provide is delivered from UK.
If you are actually in another country then you need
to discuss this with your insurer. This is a difficult area and
insurance cover may not be available.

What constitutes “accurate
and descriptive records”
There is no definitive answer to this question as
the issue cannot be addressed by a tick in the box operation, and
it would be thoroughly impractical to impose precise and prescribed
systems on every insured person.
To make a start it helps to look at this from the
viewpoint of what happens in the event of a claim. After all –
this is what the insurance is about.
Also, and I know this comes as a big surprise to honourable
people, spurious claims are made, but no matter how spurious or
unlikely a claim might seem the legal system we have will permit
the claimant their day in court – under virtually ANY set
of circumstances to have their case heard. IF it goes to Court and
IF you do not defend it (perhaps because it’s all too spurious
and ridiculous!) then you will probably loose the day. Just to get
to Court can be ruinously expensive - what with Barristers at up
to £5,000 per day!
Insurance underwriters know this and are very aware
of the legal cost and consequences and will happily take those expenses
on if they deem it necessary.
Let’s look at the life cycle of a claim
I know this is a statement of the obvious –
but in almost all cases a claim has 4 elements:
A Who is making the claim.
B Who is the claim against.
C What is the claim/gives rise to the claim/ the nature
of the claim.
D The outcome/remedy the claimant seeks.
1
The claims department need to establish if the claimant actually
has the right to make a claim.
The record required is necessary to establish that
“A” is actually in a position to make a claim against
“B”.
In a court of law it is probably that the Judge will
test the “balance of probability” of something.
So if, for example, if the insured is able to show
a nice neat system and set of records of what clients they met,
when and where and a summary of the nature of the service provided.
And those records did not show a meeting with the claimant –
and the claimant had no records to show at all, then the “balance
of probability” might fall to the insured in that they can
demonstrate they did not even deal with that client when claimed
– and there is reasonable evidence to support that.
A simple example I know, but I trust this demonstrates
the importance of records to establish who the insured met (or talked
with), when and where and what happened.
2
Again the issue of a record: This time the service provided.
I know many Coaches will say “Well I conduced a coaching session”.
But surely you made some notes on the main issues discussed? The
main objectives required by the client? These are just basic things
and not difficult. You surely do write this down don’t you!
Do not tell me you can remember it all – because we all know
you can’t.
Have you ever met with a good solicitor? You will
find in the background he has notes of the meeting. What time it
started – what time it finished – what was discussed
and MOST IMPOORTANT what he said that could be construed as ADVICE.
Now Coaches do not work quite like that but there
are lessons to learn. Coaches do not provide advice – but
if there are difficult issues to address, then in your meeting notes
make absolutely sure you note that “this (or that) issue was
addressed” and I was very careful to ensure the client was
making decisions based on their thinking – not mine.
Again meeting content notes (especially) when there
are other examples to show, bring forward a compelling case that
you are telling the truth and have a competent recording system.
You do not know what the claimant will bring up – and whatever
they do – they you must be ready to counter it.
3 The question raised concerning a claim may now be
addressed – but only after the insurer has been able to decide
if the claimant actually can bring a claim – and the nature
of that claim. Then the next range of questions may be addressed:
Is it justified?
Does it have merit?
Is the claim reasonable in the circumstances?
What will satisfy the claimant?
Do you want/ are you prepared for it to go to Court?
If it does what do the legal team think of the likely
outcome?
4
Only now can the insurer decide what to do. Some of the options
are:
Nothing
Offer a settlement
Negotiate a settlement
Go to Court
Now that we have been through the process of a potential
claim I trust you will see why it’s important that the insurer
has an accurate record of “what went on” with “who”
and “when” and “where” on the part of the
insured
I do understand this is not a simple formula –
tick the box – write the accurate report this way - type of
answer – and I trust you will see why it’s impossible
to have a one report fits all approach. However I find that starting
with a thorough knowledge of the lifecycle and process of a claim
it’s easier to provide my own answers when I know what it
is that needs to be answered.
And one final point: When (and I do believe it’s
when and not if) Coaching and many of the alternative therapies,
disciplines and practices become regulated (or at least formally
recognized as self regulating) one of the requirements will be that
each practitioner has a WRITTEN compliant procedure. There is not
one profession governed by an institute or recognised body that
will permit its members to trade without such a policy in place,
and that goes hand in glove with the requirement to have insurance.
So there is no harm in getting into this now – then everyone
will be prepared for it when it comes.

Utmost Good Faith (uberrima
fides)
All contracts of insurance are subject to utmost good faith in that
people are obliged to disclose any detail which may be of importance
to the insurers whether or not it is requested.
Whilst the words may seem simple and straightforward there is much
written on this important element of insurance contract. In short
it means you must disclose anything that MIGHT be considered as
material. Take special note of the last few words of the last paragraph.
- WHETHER OR NOT IT IS REQUESTED.
Therefore it's no argument to use "Well you didn't ask me THAT question?
Utmost good faith is therefore about Non disclosure.
To consider non-disclosure further it may be helpful to consider
what the financial ombudsman has to say about it.
Click here to read it -> http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/ombudsman-news/46/46_non_disclosure_insurance.htm
The insurance industry also has something useful to add - read it
here -> https://vault2.secured-url.com/iib/encyclopeadia_item.asp?encyclopedia_id=190

I have recently qualified
as a therapist but I am not sure what my earnings will be for next
year.If I earn more than I estimate for your quotation where do
I stand regarding insurance cover?
The answer to your question comes in several parts:
Before I provide the answer let me set out how the
premium is affected by your income.
There is a distinct difference in the premium when
the “average” income is above £100,000 (€150,000)
pa compared to a business where the income is below that average.
The reason for asking the income is to determine the
size of the business – a larger premium for bigger businesses
(where the risks are inevitably greater) and a more modest premium
for smaller businesses.
If you have a new business then we can only expect
an estimate. Now you are aware of the effect average income has
on premium we would only expect you to contact us if your income
were substantially higher than the figure you provide to the extent
that it put it in excess of £100,000 but below £250,000.
We cannot cover a business (under standard terms)
if the business income is an average greater than £250,000
pa.
To illustrate with some example figures.....
Your question:
“I estimate my first year income to be £30,000 –
but halfway through the year it clearly is likely to be around £60,000
– Do I need to tell you?”
Our answer:
I think you will see from the explanation I provide the answer is
No.
Another:
Your question:
“I estimate my first year income to be £80,000 –
but halfway through the year it clearly is likely to be around £120,000
– Do I need to tell you?”
Our answer:
Yes
Quite what would happen if the actual income figures
were similar to the example above I do not know, but I guess additional
premium might be appropriate dependant upon when in the year we
were informed and the actual numbers involved. All I can say is
that this scenario has never caused a problem for us before.

What is the difference
between a "Claims made" and a "Claims arising"
policy?
To explain the difference it is easiest to first understand
the unique circumstances that surround Professional Indemnity insurance.
Please go and read the answers to What are the key
dates?
To illustrate by example; With motor insurance when
there is a claim there is no great time gap between the "accident"
that gives rise to the claim and when the claim is made. A claim
is made immediately following an "accident".
Professional Indemnity can be quite different. The
claim can arise years after the incident that causes the claim.
A "Claims made" policy is one in which the
insurer will consider a claim they are informed of and the claim
is first known about during the policy year. The incident that caused
the claim could have been years ago - but a key date is the date
on which the claim is first known and advised.
A "Claims arising" policy is one which the
insurer will consider a claim (at any time in the future) if the
incident that gave rise to the claim occurred in the policy year.
Most policies today are "Claims made" for
the very simple reason that the insurer can "close his books"
after the policy year. An insurer issuing a "Claims arising"
policy can never close his books.

What is the "retroactive"
date?
The easiest way to answer this is by reference to
two other questions answered here.
Go first to: What are the key dates?
and then to: What is the difference between
a "Claims made" and a "Claims arising" policy?
and the answers to the two questions above should
provide a full explanation.

Am I covered for breach of copyright?
To clarify matters – you are covered for…
“any negligent act error or omission ….” It means
what is says – ANY.
Breach of copyright is a … “negligent
act” as may be many other things too numerous to list.
The words in the policy were selected to provide the
absolute widest cover for … “any negligent act error
or omission …” and we really do not know of a better
collection or words to cover anything.
If it’s a “product” you are concerned
about then that would be covered under the clause dealing with products
…..”arising out of any goods or products designed, manufactured,
constructed, altered, repaired, serviced, treated, sold, supplied
or distributed by the Insured.”
So, in short the answer is Yes on all counts regarding
the professional indemnity AND the public liability side of things
and to do with products.

On the application form
you ask for my income. Please explain why you want it - and what
exactly you mean?
The reason the underwriters need this is to establish
the size of the business. Profit, for instance, is absolutely no
good as an indicator of size as it can vary so much. The most reliable
indicator we know of is your gross turnover - or total business
income. So that is why the underwriters require it - to get a feel
for the size of your business.
The figure to provide is the correct figure to the
nearest 1,000 (or a reasonable estimate) of gross business income
derived from the business activities you are seeking cover for.
Therefore, to illustrate with an extreme example.
If your business has a gross business income, before VAT, of say
£1,000,000 but only £90,000 related to the activity
you were seeking cover with us for, then £90,000 would be
the figure to enter.

How come there seems to
be no paper for me to sign to
get the policy issued? - this doesn't seem to be the case anywhere
else.
That is true and we are the first to introduce no
signature policy issue in commercial insurance - see below for further
explanation.
Do you have to sign anything
to make this insurance valid?
The short answer is No.
If you look at the wording carefully you will see that your signed
declaration that the information entered is correct is required
at or before a claim NOT that this is required in order to issue
your policy.
We pride ourselves on being the first to introduce
commercial insurance that does not require a signature in order
to have a policy issued.
This makes the process very convenient because the
only time you would be called on the confirm that your information
is correct is in the even of a claim, and, if there were a claim
there would be a flow of paperwork anyway and a declaration would
be just one of the papers exchanged.

Can I cancel this policy?
The short answer is No.
This type of insurance cannot be cancelled.
The underwriters have to maintain the cover because
a claim could arise at any time up to the expiry date of the policy,
and if it did then they would be duty bound to deal with it. That
is what this form of insurance is all about.
If you ceased business that does not mean a claim
could not arise between the date you cease business and the end
of the policy year.

The policy contains medical terms - I don't
do anything medical - Why are they there and what does it mean?
Background:
Our policy was originally crafted and constructed to cover Coaches
and what Coaches do. We soon discovered that some Coaches are engaged
in other therapies and disciplines. Some of these other disciplines
have "medical" elements, and we wished to provide cover
for them also. As a very simple example - Aromatherapy - does have
a medical element to it. It might not be much but it is there. The
policy was therefore modified to include some medical terms to make
it suitable for some therapies and disciplines.
So that's the background as to why there are "medical
malpractice" terms within the policy.
What does it mean to you if these terms do
not apply to you.
Quite simply, if they do not apply to you - they do not
apply to you - so just ignore them. They have no effect on your
policy.
Policy documents are written to cover many eventualities.
If you read through the entire document you will find probably several
clauses that do not apply to you. However they might apply to someone,
so they therefore have to be there.
Because there are terms and conditions in a policy
that do not apply to you does not in any way diminish the cover
the policy affords.
What's important is what the Policy wording says you
are covered for: This is what our policy covers you for: "any
negligent act error or omission committed by the Insured or by any
employee of the Insured ....."

What's the difference between Errors and Omissions (E&O)
insurance, Medical Malpractice Cover and Professional Indemnity
insurance
In short the answer is not a lot in the practical
world. They are expressions that effectively means the same thing
but tend to be used in different types of business. The insurance
they provide covers essentially the same thing - the consequences
of a claim that you did something wrong or didn't do what you should
have done.
E&O
Tends to be used in business. Where a claim might be as a result
of something the business did or didn't do. Clearly there's no medical
component and no advice in the "professional" sense.
Medical Malpractice
Tends to be used wherever there is a medical element, Doctors, nurses,
dentists etc.
Professional Indemnity
Tends to be used in the "professions". Now this is where
language can tie you up, because - should a Medial Consultant be
covered for Medical Malpractice or Professional Indemnity.
It's perhaps easier to answer the question by asking
should an Architect call his cover - Medical Malpractice - (clearly
no) Errors and Omissions (well maybe - but E&O doesn't include
"advice") Clearly professional Indemnity would be the
answer.
For the medical consultant it would actually be medical
malpractice.
This is an easy one to get tied up with the words
of the title. What's really important is what the cover provides.
In all of the cases used to illustrate this here the
answer is - the cover provides for a claim against you for getting
some part of your business wrong. Be it an error, omission, incorrect
procedure - the claim that you "plain and simple" made
a mistake.
Public Liability - on the other hand is quite different.

How do I get a receipt?
A receipt is available from the client only area.
To access this you need your ID and password. If you have your ID
(there is a new one for each year - and is used to identify the
data for one year only) you may request your password from the front
page of the site.
If you have mislaid it, let us know your policy number
and we will mail the ID and password to the email address we hold
for you.
Go to the front page of this website. Enter your ID
and password into the Client Log In box. Then select receipt from
the Client only area.

What about VAT?
The is no Value Added Tax (VAT) on insurance premiums.
There is a tax payable called Insurance Premium Tax (IPT). We include
this in all our premium quotes. IPT cannot be claimed back - as
is the case in some instances with VAT.

I am informed by other insurance companies that if I want to do group work,
for example 'pamper parties' I would need to pay extra. Is this the case with
your insurance or is it included?
It all depends on what you “do” at a “Pamper party”.
If, at a “Pamper party” what you do is practice one of (or a group
of) the disciplines, therapies or business practices we provide
cover for, then you would be covered for those disciplines, therapies
or business practices that we cover you for - and there would be
at no extra charge. You will see that we are the only firm offering
this form of insurance that actually publishes a definition of each
practice we cover. None of these are any more than a very simple
description, but you should read them carefully and be sure what
you actually do at your "Pamper party" is what we cover you for.

A am currently covered for: Life Coaching, EFT, NLP.
I sometimes work with people who have been diagnosed with cancer but I obviously do not give any 'medical treatment'.
I assume that section 22 does not relate to the type of work I do but I thought I would double-check with you.
Also please confirm that your policy covers me regardless of the health of my client.
I quote a part of the policy clause you refer to:
"Claim arising out of any treatment allegedly causing, aggravation
or otherwise in connection with cancer".
The policy provides protection for you against a claim made against
you that arises either under the Professional Indemnity (that is
you made a professional error or omission while dealing with a client)
or Public Liability (a claim made against by "virtually anyone"
for damages whilst you were about the business you are covered for).
The clause you mention deals with "treatment" so you just need to
be sure you do not provide "treatment". It is my understanding that
Coaching, NLP and EFT explicitly do NOT provide treatment.
Therefore providing what you do is not, cannot be construed as,
and in fact plainly is not treatment, then this clause should cause
the underwriters little concern when they come to consider a claim
made against you.
In the course of your business you could easily deal with people
who do have cancer. Some you may know about, other may keep that
information to themselves.
For some cancer sufferers there is no detectable change in health
to the casual observer, in others it can dramatically worsen their
health and it is plain to see.
Given that I am presenting to you here a fully reasoned response
I think you (and we) would need to think very carefully on what
you mean by "regardless of the health status of my clients". At
the most extreme end of the health spectrum I can conceive that
if a client were very very ill, you may need to consider if you
should actually be dealing with them anyway! Granted I am considering
VERY extreme ill health - and thus I would be very uncomfortable
providing a complete blanket statement about ANY client in ANY state
of health.
Given that very seriously ill people naturally will clutch at straws
- and if you were dealing with them - then you should protect yourself
by explicit agreement with your client that the service you provide
is strictly limited to Coaching, NLP or EFT (as we define it) and
that treatment or healing play no part in your relationship.
Having said all of that, and providing that it is plain that no
treatment is provided, no treatment expected and none implied, and
taking into account the comments about ill health and the degree
of ill health your client suffers from, then, in general, I would
consider you to be fully covered under the policy.

I am going to stop practicing for a short while - perhaps a year
- so I do not need the insurance during that time. Someone told me that is not correct
- what is the position?
Professional Indemnity insurance differs from most
other forms of insurance because of the strong possibility that
when a claim is made it may not relate to a recent incident. Indeed
the incident to which a claim relates may have been some time in
the past. Please see the section that deals with the difference
between "claims made" and "claims arising". Therefore the fact
that you are not practicing does not mean a claim cannot arise.
This policy is "claims made" and the underwriters
must consider a claim they are notified of during the policy period.
Because the policy has a Nil Retroactice date, that means the claim
the insurers will consider may relate to an incident that occurred
at any time in the past.
With car insurance, for instance, if you get rid of
the car - you get rid of the insurance. If you do not have a car
right now, then what claim can arise 2 years after you get rid of
the car (that you didn't actually know about when you got rid of
the car)?
This is very different. The fact that you are not
practicing right now, does not mean a claim cannot arise. Another
reason why insurers cannot cancel such policies without serious
reason - because policy concellation does NOT mean a claim cannot
arise.
So, to fully answer the question, it really isn't
correct that you do not "need" the insurance beacuse you
are not practicing.
|